From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BAIN v. STATE

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jan 14, 2003
93 S.W.3d 761 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 80996

October 29, 2002 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 14, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Joan Burger, Judge.

Nancy L. Vincent, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorneys General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., J. and Kathianne Knaup Crane, J.



ORDER


Movant, Keith Bain, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

BAIN v. STATE

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jan 14, 2003
93 S.W.3d 761 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

BAIN v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:Keith Bain, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Jan 14, 2003

Citations

93 S.W.3d 761 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)