From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bain v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 24, 2000
29 S.W.3d 414 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77561

FILED: October 24, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE JOAN M. BURGER.

S. Paige Canfield, 1221 Locust, Suite 350, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John M. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



Keith Bain (Movant) appeals the judgment in his 29.15 motion denying his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to allow him to testify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the exclusive use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bain v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 24, 2000
29 S.W.3d 414 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Bain v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEITH BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Oct 24, 2000

Citations

29 S.W.3d 414 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)