From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baillis v. Fuchs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 26, 1939
258 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

December 26, 1939.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.


Judgment permanently enjoining defendant labor union and its members from picketing plaintiffs' place of business and the places of business of their customers and from doing every and all acts which may interfere with the conduct of plaintiffs' business, and order denying appellants' motion to resettle the judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act has no application to the facts in the instant case. It appears that since the strike was called plaintiffs have been conducting their business themselves and performing substantially all the work formerly done by their former employees, now members of defendant union. Therefore, there is no "labor dispute" within the letter or spirit of the statutory definition and plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction restraining defendants from picketing and interfering with their business. ( Thompson v. Boekhout, 273 N.Y. 390.)


Summaries of

Baillis v. Fuchs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 26, 1939
258 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Baillis v. Fuchs

Case Details

Full title:ABOU S. BAILLIS, ISIDOR BAILLIS, SOL BAILLIS and SHELLY BAILLIS, Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 26, 1939

Citations

258 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Department of Industrial Relations v. Pesnell

828, 829; Boro Park Sanitary Live Poultry Market v. Heller, 280 N.Y. 481, 21 N.E.2d 687, 688; Quinton's…