From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Vargas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 23, 2022
5:22-cv-01488-FLA (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

5:22-cv-01488-FLA (KKx)

11-23-2022

MARQUISE BAILEY Plaintiff, v. ROCIO VARGAS ET AL Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA United States District Judge

In light of the Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement, the court orders the action dismissed without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within thirty days from the date of this Order, provided any request by a party to do so shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 30-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party making such a request reasonably expects the process to be concluded. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which does not require approval of the court. Such stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 30-day period, or by such later date ordered by the court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms to the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above. All pending dates and deadlines are hereby vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Vargas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 23, 2022
5:22-cv-01488-FLA (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Bailey v. Vargas

Case Details

Full title:MARQUISE BAILEY Plaintiff, v. ROCIO VARGAS ET AL Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

5:22-cv-01488-FLA (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2022)