From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Tatum

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division
Jun 4, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV508-075 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 4, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV508-075.

June 4, 2009


ORDER


Presently before the Court are Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In his Objections, Plaintiff contends the risk of future injury is enough for an inmate to satisfy the imminent danger exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff also contends that any case which was not dismissed as being frivolous or malicious or for failing to state a claim does not constitute a strike under section 1915(g).

Plaintiff's Objections are without merit. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed with this cause of action, he may resubmit his Complaint along with the requisite $350.00 filing fee. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Tatum

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division
Jun 4, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV508-075 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Bailey v. Tatum

Case Details

Full title:ELIJAH FOSTER BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. RICKY TATUM; DEBORAH J. MOORE, and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV508-075 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Gigger v. Corrections Corporation of America

Prior to the PLRA, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), "a court could dismiss a case if the allegation of poverty was…