From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 20, 1994
640 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-02039.

July 20, 1994.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Bob Anderson Mitcham, Judge.


The trial court denied as time-barred the appellant's motion for postconviction relief, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse because the motion was filed within two years of the issuance of this court's mandate in the appellant's direct appeal from his judgment and sentence in this case. See McCuiston v. State, 507 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (judgment of conviction becomes final upon issuance of mandate in direct appeal), approved in, 534 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 1988).

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 20, 1994
640 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Bailey v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WARREN BAILEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 20, 1994

Citations

640 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Rosado v. State

The law in Florida is that a 3.850 motion filed within two years of the issuance of a mandate is timely…

Bailey v. Crosby

Reversed and remanded. Bailey v. State, 640 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the State filed a…