From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 19, 2008
No. 09-08-063 CR (Tex. App. Mar. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. 09-08-063 CR

Opinion Delivered March 19, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the 359th District Court, Montgomery County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 06-04-03556-CR.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On February 21, 2008, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal, and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. The appellant did not file a response. The State contests jurisdiction. The notice of appeal seeks to appeal the trial court's order continuing appellant's community supervision and imposing additional conditions. The trial court's order is not appealable. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex.Crim.App. 1977) (Appellate court lacks jurisdiction on direct appeal from an order modifying the terms and conditions of probation.). Accordingly, we hold the order from which appellant appeals is not appealable. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.


Summaries of

Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 19, 2008
No. 09-08-063 CR (Tex. App. Mar. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Bailey v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY ALAN BAILEY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Mar 19, 2008

Citations

No. 09-08-063 CR (Tex. App. Mar. 19, 2008)