From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Smokowicz

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2013
515 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-2255

03-28-2013

CHRISTOPHER C. BAILEY, IV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAN SMOKOWICZ, City Attorney; TOM BARRET, Mayor, Defendants - Appellees.

Christopher C. Bailey, IV, Appellant Pro Se. James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:12-cv-00042-RBS-DEM) Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher C. Bailey, IV, Appellant Pro Se. James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher C. Bailey, IV, appeals the district court's order denying his motion for default judgment and granting defendants' motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), (5), (6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. Smokowicz, No. 4:12-cv-00042-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13, 2012; entered Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bailey v. Smokowicz

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2013
515 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Bailey v. Smokowicz

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER C. BAILEY, IV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAN SMOKOWICZ, City…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 28, 2013

Citations

515 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2013)