From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Schaaf

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 23, 2012
491 Mich. 924 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 144055. COA No. 295801.

2012-05-23

Devon Scott BAILEY, Plaintiff–Appellee/Cross–Appellant, v. Steven Gerome SCHAAF, Defendant, and T.J. Realty, Inc., d/b/a Hi–Tech Protection, Timothy Johnson, Captain William Boyd Baker, Christopher Lee Campbell, Defendants–Appellees, and Evergreen Regency Townhomes, Ltd., and Radney Management & Investments, Defendants–Appellants/Cross–Appellees.


Prior report: 293 Mich.App. 611, 810 N.W.2d 641.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. The application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether the Court of Appeals erred when it extended the limited duty of merchants—to involve the police when a situation on the premises poses an imminent risk of harm to identifiable invitees, see MacDonald v. PKT, Inc., 464 Mich. 322, 628 N.W.2d 33 (2001)—to landlords and other premises proprietors, such as the defendant apartment complex and property management company. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant remains pending.

The Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc. and the Michigan Association for Justice are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Schaaf

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 23, 2012
491 Mich. 924 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

Bailey v. Schaaf

Case Details

Full title:Devon Scott BAILEY, Plaintiff–Appellee/Cross–Appellant, v. Steven Gerome…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 23, 2012

Citations

491 Mich. 924 (Mich. 2012)
812 N.W.2d 770

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Schaaf

whether the Court of Appeals erred when it extended the limited duty of merchants—to involve the police when…