From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. National Carloading Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 13, 1943
139 F.2d 383 (D.C. Cir. 1943)

Opinion

No. 8429.

Decided December 13, 1943.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Action by Rolla A. Bailey against the National Carloading Corporation under the Fair Labor Standards Act to recover overtime pay, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Messrs. H.L. McCormick and Roy S. Parsons, both of Washington, D.C., submitted on the brief for appellant.

Messrs. Robert E. Quirk and Joseph T. Sherier, both of Washington, D.C., submitted on the brief for appellee.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and EDGERTON, Associate Justices.


This is a proceeding under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to recover overtime pay, liquidated damages and attorney's fees. The Act provides in Sections 6 and 7, for minimum rates of wages, maximum hours of employment and overtime compensation in case of employment in excess of the maximum specified. The trial court made but a single finding of fact as follows: "The plaintiff failed to prove, by the preponderance of the evidence, that he worked the overtime claimed in his complaint." It concluded as a matter of law that he was not entitled to recover the amount claimed or any other sum. The evidence upon this question is in serious conflict, but it is clearly susceptible of the interpretation placed upon it by the court in its finding of fact. Consequently, there is no reason to interfere with the judgment.

52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 et seq.

Rule 52, Fed. Rules Civ.Proc.; Tennessee Coal, Iron R. Co. v. Muscoda Local No. 123, 5 Cir., 137 F.2d 176, 180, 181.

In view of our decision upon the foregoing question it is unnecessary to consider the other questions presented in the briefs.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Bailey v. National Carloading Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 13, 1943
139 F.2d 383 (D.C. Cir. 1943)
Case details for

Bailey v. National Carloading Corporation

Case Details

Full title:BAILEY v. NATIONAL CARLOADING CORPORATION

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Dec 13, 1943

Citations

139 F.2d 383 (D.C. Cir. 1943)
78 U.S. App. D.C. 244

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Blankenship

No useful purpose could be served by reviewing the testimony here. The court saw and heard the witnesses, and…