Opinion
SC21-374
07-12-2021
JOHN BAILEY Petitioner(s) v. MARK S. INCH, ETC. Respondent(s)
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 521991CF019920XXXXNO
To the extent that Petitioner challenges his sentence, the petition is hereby dismissed because this Court generally will not consider the repetitive petitions of persons who have abused the judicial processes of the lower courts such that they have been barred from filing certain actions there. See Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930, 931 (Fla. 2000). To the extent that Petitioner seeks additional relief, the petition is hereby denied. See Jones v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 48 So.3d 704 (Fla. 2010); Sneed v. Mayo, 69 So.2d 653 (Fla. 1954). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court.
POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUNIZ, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.