Bailey v. Gulf Insurance Company

7 Citing cases

  1. Firstier Mortg. v. Investors Mortg. Ins.

    708 F. Supp. 1224 (W.D. Okla. 1989)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that where borrowers had not contributed down payments or "earnest deposits" they therefore had no cash equity in the subject properties

    It is a fundamental principal of the law of agency that the agent's knowledge is imputed to his principal. Bailey v. Gulf Insurance Co., 389 F.2d 889, 891 (10th Cir. 1968); A.A. Murphy, Inc. v. Banfield, 363 P.2d 942, 946 (Okla. 1961); Capps v. Whitegrass-Waterhole Flood Control and Soil Conservancy District, 359 P.2d 318, 321 (Okla.

  2. Bailey v. Gulf Insurance Company

    406 F.2d 47 (10th Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times
    In Bailey v. Gulf Ins. Co., 406 F.2d 47 (10th Cir. 1969) (Oklahoma law), the building in question had been declared a nuisance by the city and ordered demolished, but the court nonetheless concluded that the insurance company was not shielded from liability.

    On appeal, this court determined that liability had been established and reversed and remanded with directions to proceed to a determination solely on the question of the proper amount of damages. Bailey v. Gulf Insurance Co., 389 F.2d 889 (10th Cir. 1968). The present appeal by the insured is from the judgment of the trial court again rendered in favor of the insurance company.

  3. Cole v. Kelley

    438 F. Supp. 129 (C.D. Cal. 1977)   Cited 9 times
    Tolling of statute of limitations due to fraudulent concealment ends when "plaintiff acquires knowledge, or could by the exercise of due diligence [acquire knowledge], that he may have a potential claim"

    The knowledge of Cole's attorneys about the eavesdropping was imputed to him. Bailey v. Gulf Insurance Co., 10 Cir., 389 F.2d 889 (1968); Eitel v. Schmidlapp, 4 Cir., 459 F.2d 609 (1972). It is unnecessary to discuss the last possible accrual date (August 22, 1970), because it presents some questions that are not involved in connection with the other beginning dates.

  4. In re Brooke Corp.

    CASE NO. 08-22786, (jointly administered), ADV. NO. 10-06162 (Bankr. D. Kan. Jun. 14, 2011)   Cited 1 times

    Notice to NSL's statutory agent was notice to NSL.E.g., Bailey v. Gulf Ins. Co., 389 F.2d 889, 891 (10th Cir. 1968) ("The general rule is that knowledge of an agent obtained within the scope of his authority is ordinarily imputed to his principal.").

  5. In re Amendments to the Okla. Unif. Jury Instructions

    2020 OK 3 (Okla. 2020)   Cited 1 times

    The Oklahoma Supreme Court held in Tiger v. Verdigris Valley Electric Cooperative, 2016 OK 74, ΒΆ 16, 410 P.3d 1007, 1012, that "the knowledge or notice possessed by an agent while acting within the scope of authority is the knowledge of, or notice to the principal." In Bailey v. Gulf Insurance Co., 389 F.2d 889, 891 (10th Cir. 1968), the general rule was stated that "knowledge of an agent obtained within the scope of his authority is ordinarily imputed to his principal." Motors Ins. Corp. v. Freeman, 304 P.2d 328, 330 (Okla.

  6. Tiger v. Verdigris Valley Elec. Coop.

    2016 OK 74 (Okla. 2016)   Cited 21 times

    That conclusion failed to consider that the knowledge or notice possessed by an agent while acting within the scope of authority is the knowledge of, or notice to the principal. Bailey v. Gulf Ins. Co., 389 F.2d 889, 891 (10th Cir.1968). Thus, the lower courts' emphasis on the fact Employer was generally a "safety minded" organization and its safety record was good overall, was entirely misplaced.

  7. C.H. Stuart, Inc. v. Bennett

    1980 OK 135 (Okla. 1980)   Cited 7 times

    When Sarah Coventry receives the orders from field agents in the New York office, it then has notice that the agents are regularly making direct sales and must either correct the practice or be bound by the acts of the agents and accept the benefits and burdens thereof, including compliance with the domestication and trade-name registration statutes of Oklahoma. Bailey v. Gulf Insurance Co., 389 F.2d 889, 891 (10th Cir. 1968).A.A. Murphy, Inc. v. Banfield, 363 P.2d 942, 946 (Okla. 1961).