From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 24, 2024
CV 23-10844-SPG-MAA (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-10844-SPG-MAA

05-24-2024

Marquis Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc. et al


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before June 5, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff obtained entry of default as to Defendants Ivan Geovanny Loor, and Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc., pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), but Plaintiff has not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 24, 2024
CV 23-10844-SPG-MAA (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co.

Case Details

Full title:Marquis Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc. et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 24, 2024

Citations

CV 23-10844-SPG-MAA (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)