From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Oct 6, 2011
373 P.3d 893 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 59123.

10-06-2011

Anthony D. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark; and The Honorable Timothy C. Williams, District Judge, Respondents, and Lance A. Maningo, Real party in interest.

Anthony D. Bailey Lance A. Maningo


Anthony D. Bailey

Lance A. Maningo

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS, OR PROHIBITION

This original proper person petition for a writ of certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition challenges the district court's alleged dismissal of petitioner's district court action as to real party in interest.

The clerk of this court shall modify the caption for this matter to conform to the caption on this order.

Writ relief is generally available when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.020(2) ; NRS 34.170 ; NRS 34.330. A writ of certiorari is available to confine an inferior tribunal, board, or officer exercising judicial functions to the limits of its jurisdiction. NRS 34.020(2). A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. NRS 34.160. And writ of prohibition may issue to confine the district court to the proper exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction when the court has acted in excess of its jurisdiction. NRS 34.320. The issuance of a writ of certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition is purely within this court's discretion. Dangberg Holdings v. Douglas Co., 115 Nev. 129, 138, 978 P.2d 311, 316 (1999) ; Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991). Having reviewed the petition, we decline to exercise our discretion to extraordinarily intervene in the district court proceedings. Id.; NRAP 21(b)(1) and (c). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

In light of this order, we deny as moot petitioner's motion to proceed in proper person.
The Honorable Robert E. Rose and the Honorable Miriam Shearing, Senior Justices, participated in the decision of this matter under general orders of assignment.

--------


Summaries of

Bailey v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Oct 6, 2011
373 P.3d 893 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Bailey v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:Anthony D. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 893 (Nev. 2011)