Opinion
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC CAROLINE A. BYRNE, Costa Mesa, California, Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF TUSTIN, CITY OF TUSTIN erroneously sued as CITY OF TUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT and TUSTIN POLICE OFFICER STROUD
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
The Court having granted the motion for summary judgment of Defendants CITY OF TUSTIN, the CITY OF TUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, and TUSTIN POLICE OFFICER BRIAN STROUD as to the second and fourth counts of the operative complaint, and Plaintiff MICHAEL BAILEY having agreed in his opposition to that motion to the dismissal of the first and third counts of the operative complaint, and no other claims remaining,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff MICHAEL BAILEY take nothing by way of his complaint, that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants CITY OF TUSTIN, the CITY OF TUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, and TUSTIN POLICE OFFICER BRIAN STROUD, and that said Defendants recover their costs.