From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. City Attorney's Office of N. Las Vegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 27, 2013
2:13-CV-343 JCM (CWH) (D. Nev. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

2:13-CV-343 JCM (CWH)

03-27-2013

ANTHONY BAILEY, Plaintiff(s), v. CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff's motion for default judgment. (Doc. # 6).

Plaintiff argues that the state defendants failed to timely file an answer to plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. # 6). State defendants have since filed an answer (doc. # 7), and the court recognizes the preference for deciding cases on the merits. The court finds good cause to deny the motion and permit the action to proceed to its merits.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's motion for default judgment (doc. # 6) be, and the same hereby, is DENIED.

________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bailey v. City Attorney's Office of N. Las Vegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 27, 2013
2:13-CV-343 JCM (CWH) (D. Nev. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Bailey v. City Attorney's Office of N. Las Vegas

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BAILEY, Plaintiff(s), v. CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF NORTH LAS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

2:13-CV-343 JCM (CWH) (D. Nev. Mar. 27, 2013)