From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Blue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Jun 11, 2009
No. 5:09-CV-195-F (E.D.N.C. Jun. 11, 2009)

Opinion

No. 5:09-CV-195-F.

June 11, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's May 8, 2009, Memorandum and Recommendation (M R) [DE-5]. The plaintiff, Robert Gene Bailey filed a timely "Objection" [DE-6] thereto.

Rule 72(b), FED R CIV. P. provides in pertinent part that "a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations" contained in an M R. Thereafter, the district judge "shall make a de novo determination . . . of any portion of the [M R] to which specific written objection has been made." Objections must be filed within ten days of service of the M R. See Rule 72(b), FED. R. CIV. P.

The court has conducted a careful independent review of the record in this matter and concurs with the Magistrate Judge's analysis contained in his M R. The court, therefore, has reached the de novo determination that the M R is correct and in accordance with the law.

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's M R, and hereby ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED as FRIVOLOUS for the reasons cogently stated in the M R. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Blue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Jun 11, 2009
No. 5:09-CV-195-F (E.D.N.C. Jun. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Bailey v. Blue

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GENE BAILEY Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM BLUE, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division

Date published: Jun 11, 2009

Citations

No. 5:09-CV-195-F (E.D.N.C. Jun. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Roberson

its employees in their official capacities are protected by sovereign immunity under this rule. See Bailey…

Bailey v. Toman

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see Tolbert v. Stevenson, 635 F.3d 646, 650 (4th Cir. 2011). Plaintiff previously has…