From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailen v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

June 18, 1984


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants Charles Jones and Claudette Richardson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), dated August 9, 1983, which granted plaintiff's ex parte application for an order directing expedient service of process pursuant to CPLR 308 (subd 5). ¶ Appeal dismissed. No appeal lies from an ex parte order (see Violante v. Berkowitz, 90 A.D.2d 837). ¶ In any event, were we to deem it appropriate to treat the instant appeal as an application for review pursuant to CPLR 5704 (subd [a]), we would deny the application. Rubin, J.P., Boyers, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bailen v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Bailen v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE BAILEN, Respondent, v. CHARLES JONES et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1984

Citations

102 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Heitler v. Glucksman

Further, no appeal lies from an order entered ex parte ( see Bailen v. Jones, 102 A.D.2d 859). SANTUCCI,…

In the Matter of DeChirico v. DeChirico

DECISION ORDER ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated July 10, 2003, is dismissed, without costs or…