From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BAHM v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jun 26, 2003
No. 09-03-220-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2003)

Opinion

No. 09-03-220-CR

Opinion Delivered June 26, 2003. Do Not Publish.

On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 00-12-07754-CR.

Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


We have before the Court an appeal by Christopher Jordan Bahm from a sentence pronounced February 14, 2003. No motion for new trial was timely filed. The notice of appeal was filed with the trial court on April 11, 2003, more than thirty days from the date sentence was imposed in open court. We notified the parties that the appeal did not appear to have been timely filed, but received no reply. The court finds the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Tex.R.App.P. 26.2. No extension of time was timely requested pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 26.3. It does not appear that appellant obtained an out-of-time appeal. The Court finds it is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal of this cause be DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

BAHM v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jun 26, 2003
No. 09-03-220-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2003)
Case details for

BAHM v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER JORDAN BAHM, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jun 26, 2003

Citations

No. 09-03-220-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2003)