From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BAEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT GRACE

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 29, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-5629 (E.D. Pa. May. 29, 2008)

Summary

finding no prejudice in light of substantial evidence against petitioner, including petitioner's incriminating statement to the police and eyewitness testimony against him

Summary of this case from United States v. Ezell

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-5629.

May 29, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2008, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Responses thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated March 11, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. the R R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

No objections were filed.


Summaries of

BAEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT GRACE

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 29, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-5629 (E.D. Pa. May. 29, 2008)

finding no prejudice in light of substantial evidence against petitioner, including petitioner's incriminating statement to the police and eyewitness testimony against him

Summary of this case from United States v. Ezell
Case details for

BAEZ v. SUPERINTENDENT GRACE

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN BAEZ, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT GRACE, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 29, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-5629 (E.D. Pa. May. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ezell

The Court concludes that, based on the formidable evidence presented at trial, there is no reasonable…