From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baer v. Norene

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 9, 1935
79 F.2d 340 (9th Cir. 1935)

Opinion

No. 7890.

September 9, 1935.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; James Alger Fee, Judge.

Habeas corpus proceeding by Walter Baer against Roy J. Norene, Divisional Director of Immigration for the District of Oregon. From an order denying the application for the writ, the petitioner appeals.

Order affirmed.

Irvin Goodman, of Portland, Or., for appellant.

Carl C. Donaugh, U.S. Atty., and Hugh L. Biggs, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.


The petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree in 1917; later, in 1919, he was convicted of knowingly uttering a forged bank check; and still later, in 1921, was convicted of forgery of an indorsement on a check. The only contention raised by the appellant is that these crimes do not involve moral turpitude and therefore cannot form the basis for deportation. It is clear that these offenses involve moral turpitude.

The order of the lower court denying the application of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.


Summaries of

Baer v. Norene

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 9, 1935
79 F.2d 340 (9th Cir. 1935)
Case details for

Baer v. Norene

Case Details

Full title:BAER v. NORENE, Divisional Director of Immigration

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 9, 1935

Citations

79 F.2d 340 (9th Cir. 1935)

Citing Cases

Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales

We concluded in United States v. Becker, 919 F.2d 568, 573 (9th Cir. 1990), that burglary constitutes a crime…

Weirich v. Astrue

Under California and Ninth Circuit precedent, forgery is a crime of moral turpitude. See Baer v. Norene , 79…