From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Badock v. City of Cleveland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
May 16, 2007
Case No. 06-3102 (N.D. Ohio May. 16, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 06-3102.

May 16, 2007


ORDER


On March 27, 2007, this Court notified plaintiff that unless good cause is shown for failure to serve defendant as provided under the rules, this action would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Upon review of the docket, there has been no good cause shown and no service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant in this matter. Therefore,

Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the above entitled case is hereby dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Badock v. City of Cleveland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
May 16, 2007
Case No. 06-3102 (N.D. Ohio May. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Badock v. City of Cleveland

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. BADOCK, JR. Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

Case No. 06-3102 (N.D. Ohio May. 16, 2007)