From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bacon Constr. Co. v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Jul 6, 2022
C. A. 20-00280-MSM-LDA (D.R.I. Jul. 6, 2022)

Opinion

C. A. 20-00280-MSM-LDA

07-06-2022

BACON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and AGOSTINI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiffs, v. OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY and THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY both d/b/a LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; COLONY DRYWALL, INC.; DANIEL ALFAIATE; and MARLENE ALFAIATE, Defendants.


ORDER

MARY S. MCELROY, DISTRICT JUDGE

With respect to the plaintiffs', Bacon Construction Co., Inc. and Agostini Construction Co., Inc. (“Bacon” and “Agostini”), Motion for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 (ECF No. 38), and on the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of the defendants, Ohio Security Insurance Co. and the Ohio Casualty Ins. Co., both d/b/a Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Ohio Security and/or Ohio Casualty”) (ECF No. 40), it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40) is DENIED.
2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, only as to Count I, seeking a declaration with respect to their right to a defense and/or indemnity under
policies of insurance issued by Ohio Security and/or Ohio Casualty (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED.

3. The following Declaratory Judgment shall enter:

(a) Bacon qualifies as an insured under the Commercial General Liability policy issued by Ohio Security referenced in Paragraph 9 of the Second Amended Petition for Declaratory Relief;

(b) Bacon qualifies as an insured under the Umbrella policy issued by Ohio Casualty referenced in Paragraph 10 of the Second Amended Petition for Declaratory Relief;

(c) Agostini qualifies as an insured under the Commercial General Liability policy issued by Ohio Security referenced in Paragraph 9 of the Second Amended Petition for Declaratory Relief;

(d) Agostini qualifies as an insured under the Umbrella policy issued by Ohio Casualty referenced in Paragraph 10 of the Second Amended Petition for Declaratory Relief;

(e) Ohio Security owes a duty to defend Bacon and Agostini as to the claims asserted by Daniel and Marlene Alfaiate (“the Alfaiate litigation”) in the Massachusetts Superior Court action referenced in Paragraph 17 of the Second Amended Petition for Declaratory Relief;

(f) Bacon and Agostini shall be reimbursed, by the defendants, for the fees and costs incurred in connection with the defense of the Alfaiate litigation;

(g) Plaintiffs shall submit a bill of costs to the defendants within 30 days of this order. Thereafter Defendants will have 30 days to respond.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bacon Constr. Co. v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Jul 6, 2022
C. A. 20-00280-MSM-LDA (D.R.I. Jul. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Bacon Constr. Co. v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BACON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and AGOSTINI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: Jul 6, 2022

Citations

C. A. 20-00280-MSM-LDA (D.R.I. Jul. 6, 2022)