From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Backus v. City of Auburn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3020 KJM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-3020 KJM CKD PS

02-12-2013

BARTLEY BACKUS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF AUBURN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has served a subpoena duces tecum on non-party AT&T. The subpoena indicates AT&T is located in North Palm Beach, Florida. As such, any subpoena duces tecum should have issued from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2)(C). The subpoena will therefore be quashed as improvidently issued.

Upon review of the pleadings in this matter, the court has determined that no subpoenas shall issue in this matter upon plaintiff's request unless approved by the court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The subpoena duces tecum served on non-party AT&T, dated January 8, 2013, is quashed.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on AT&T Subpoena Center, 3 ATT Plaza, 308 South Akard Street, 14th Floor-M, Dallas, TX 75202.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue no subpoenas to plaintiff absent further order of the court.

_______________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Backus v. City of Auburn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3020 KJM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Backus v. City of Auburn

Case Details

Full title:BARTLEY BACKUS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF AUBURN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-3020 KJM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)