From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Babcock v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 14, 2009
CV 08-08467 SJO (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2009)

Opinion


ARTHUR BABCOCK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Counter-claimant, v. ARTHUR BABCOCK; DANTE JUMANAN; and THOMAS R. SOPER, Counterclaim-defendants, DANTE JUMANAN; and THOMAS R. SOPER Counter-claimants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Counterclaim-Defendant. No. CV 08-08467 SJO (FFMx) United States District Court, C.D. California. December 14, 2009

          SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT ARTHUR BABCOCK AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS DANTE JUMANAN AND THOMAS R SOPER

          S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

         Defendant and counterclaimant United States of America's Motion for Summary Judgment came before this Court on September 21, 2009, the Honorable S. James Otero, United States District Judge, presiding.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:

1. Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Section 6671, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendan Arthur Babcock and Counterclaim Defendants Dante Jumanan and Thomas R. Soper are personally liable, jointly, and severally, for unpaid income and employment taxes withheld from the wages and salaries of the employees of AES Construction Group, Inc., during the Third and Fourth Quarters of 2002 in the amount of $194, 532.85, as of July 6, 2006, plus accrued but unassessed interest that has come due since the dates of the assessment.

2. Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Section 6672, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Arthur Babcock and Counterclaim Defendants Dante Jumanan and Thomas R. Soper are personally liable, jointly, and severally, for unpaid income and employment taxes withheld from the wages and salaries of the employees of AES Management, Inc., during the Third and Fourth Quarters of 2002 and the Second Quarter of 2003 in the amount of $503, 292.24, as of July 6, 2006, plus accrued but unassessed interest that has come due since the dates of the assessment.

3. Plaintiff Arthur Babcock takes nothing by his Complaint.

4. Dante Jumanan and Thomas R. Soper take nothing by their counterclaims.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Babcock v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 14, 2009
CV 08-08467 SJO (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Babcock v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR BABCOCK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, UNITED…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 14, 2009

Citations

CV 08-08467 SJO (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2009)