From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B. R. L. v. Vista

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 9, 2023
1:21-cv-01445-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01445-JLT-CDB

02-09-2023

B. R. L., by and through his guardian ad litem, FRANCHESCA LARA, and MIGUEL LARA, Plaintiffs, v. CLINICA SIERRA VISTA, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER AS MODIFIED

(ECF NO. 27)

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the parties' third stipulated request for an extension of time to complete expert discovery, file pretrial motions and try the case. (ECF No. 27).

The Court's initial scheduling order entered on December 20, 2021, granted the parties' request for a 12-month period to conduct and complete expert discovery. (ECF Nos. 8, 9). With the present requested extension, the parties seek to expand this period to a total of 18 months.

Based on the Court's review of the parties' earlier-filed stipulations for extensions, the Court finds that the parties have undertaken discovery diligently and that their current request for an additional extension of dates satisfies the requirements under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(4) to show good cause. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). In particular, since their most recent stipulation for extension, filed on October 6, 2022 (ECF No. 21), the parties have completed four depositions and an independent medical examination of the minor Plaintiff by three medical practitioners. (ECF No. 27 at p. 2).

The parties' requested extension appears directed in part to accommodate a private mediation scheduled for May 16, 2023. In their earlier stipulation, the parties reported that a private mediation was scheduled for February 17, 2023. The Court is unclear whether the earlier mediation was rescheduled or whether the May 16 mediation is a separate event. While further requests for discovery, motion or trial extensions are discouraged and no requests for extension will be granted without a showing of diligence by the parties and good cause, the Court directs the parties to elaborate in any future request the course and status of settlement efforts.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Scheduling Order is amended as follows:

EVENT

DEADLINE

NEW DEADLINE

Plaintiff Expert Disclosures

January 12, 2023

March 10, 2023

Defendant Expert Disclosures

February 22, 2023

April 28, 2023

Rebuttal Expert Disclosures

March 15, 2023

May 12, 2023

Expert Discovery Cut-Off

May 12, 2023

August 4, 2023

Non-Dispositive Motion Filing

May 26, 2023

August 18, 2023

Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing

June 30, 2023

September 22, 2023

Dispositive Motion Filing

July 7, 2023

September 29, 2023

Dispositive Motion Hearing

August 11, 2023

November 14, 2023

Pre-Trial Conference

October 10 2023

January 8, 2024, at 1:30 p.m.

Trial

December 12, 2023

March 5, 2024, at 8:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

B. R. L. v. Vista

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 9, 2023
1:21-cv-01445-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2023)
Case details for

B. R. L. v. Vista

Case Details

Full title:B. R. L., by and through his guardian ad litem, FRANCHESCA LARA, and…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 9, 2023

Citations

1:21-cv-01445-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2023)