From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Azevedo v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2023
2:22-CV-01925-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CV-01925-MCE-KJN

06-01-2023

BROOKE LYNN AZEVEDO, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

BARBARA MARIE RIZZO ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF GERALYN GULSETH (As authorized via e-mail) Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security


BARBARA MARIE RIZZO ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

GERALYN GULSETH (As authorized via e-mail) Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 28 U.S.C. §2412(D)

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court's approval, that Plaintiff be awarded TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00) in attorney fees and ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY-SEVEN CENTS ($115.27) in expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). These amounts represent compensation for legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §2412(d).

After the Court issues an order awarding EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the Government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order awarding EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the Government will determine whether the fees are subject to any offset. If the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Government shall cause the payment of fees and expenses to be made directly to Barbara Marie Rizzo, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek attorney fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00) and expenses and in the amount of ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY-SEVEN CENTS ($115.27), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), subject to the terms of the above referenced Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Azevedo v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2023
2:22-CV-01925-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Azevedo v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:BROOKE LYNN AZEVEDO, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2023

Citations

2:22-CV-01925-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2023)