Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park

Full title: AZCO REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. The VILLAGE AT GULFSTREAM PARK, etc., et…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 19, 2014

152 So. 3d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

Nos. 3D14–0984 3D14–0005.

11-19-2014

AZCO REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. The VILLAGE AT GULFSTREAM PARK, etc., et al., Appellees.

Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust, Friedberg, English & Allen and Jon W. Zeder, for appellant. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke and Jonathon S. Miller (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees, The Village of Gulfstream Park, LLC and Forest City Commercial Group, Inc.; Egozi & Bennett and Bernard L. Egozi and Issac S. Lew (Aventura), for appellees, Burn World-Wide, Inc. d/b/a BGT Partners and David Clarke.

PER CURIAM.

Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust, Friedberg, English & Allen and Jon W. Zeder, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke and Jonathon S. Miller (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees, The Village of Gulfstream Park, LLC and Forest City Commercial Group, Inc.; Egozi & Bennett and Bernard L. Egozi and Issac S. Lew (Aventura), for appellees, Burn World-Wide, Inc. d/b/a BGT Partners and David Clarke.

Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geneva Inv., Ltd. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd., 274 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) ; Bradley v. Banks, 260 So.2d 256, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (“The appellee was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs' claim for a portion of a real estate commission because there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the proposition that [plaintiff-appellant] was not registered as a real estate broker or salesman at the time the act or service was performed.”).