From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ayers v. Tioga County Sheriff's Dept.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Jun 12, 1997
240 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion


240 A.D.2d 819 658 N.Y.S.2d 533 In the Matter of the Claim of Patricia AYERS, Respondent, v. TIOGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Appellant. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. Supreme Court of New York, Third Department June 12, 1997.

         Coughlins&sGerhart (Jeffrey A. Brown, of counsel), Binghamton, for appellant.

        Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General (Iris A. Steel, of counsel), New York City, for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.

        Before CARDONA, P.J., and MERCURE, CREW, YESAWICH and CARPINELLO, JJ.

        MEMORANDUM DECISION.

        Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed May 2, 1995, which ruled that the death of claimant's decedent arose out of his employment and awarded claimant workers' compensation death benefits.

        After decedent died at home as a result of cardiac arrhythmia, claimant, decedent's wife, filed a claim for workers' compensation death benefits. After a hearing, the Workers' Compensation Board found that decedent's death was causally related to stress engendered by his job as the Sheriff of Tioga County and awarded claimant death benefits. We find that the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Testimony at the hearing established that during the three months prior to his death, decedent became increasingly irritable due to job-related stress arising from, among other things, numerous pending lawsuits, some of which named him personally, and frustration at not being able to perform his duties due to political controversy. Claimant's medical experts, who reviewed various job-related stresses in decedent's life, testified that the stress experienced by decedent was a cause of his cardiac arrhythmia. Under these circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that decedent's death was causally related to his employment (see, Matter of Rock v. Sullivan County Sheriff's Dept., 199 A.D.2d 659, 604 N.Y.S.2d 1015) despite decedent's history of hypertension and arteriosclerosis (see generally, Matter of Kroeger v. New York State Workers' Compensation Bd., 222 A.D.2d 912, 635 N.Y.S.2d 112, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 801, 644 N.Y.S.2d 688, 667 N.E.2d 338).

        ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Summaries of

Ayers v. Tioga County Sheriff's Dept.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Jun 12, 1997
240 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Ayers v. Tioga County Sheriff's Dept.

Case Details

Full title:Ayers v. Tioga County Sheriff's Dept.

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 533