From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Awah v. Capital One Bank

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2016
No. 16-1361 (4th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-1361

08-29-2016

EDMUND AWAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK, NA, Defendant - Appellee.

Edmund K. Awah, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Alan Fratkin, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Craig Robert Haughton, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:14-cv-01288-DKC) Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edmund K. Awah, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Alan Fratkin, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Craig Robert Haughton, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edmund Awah appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Capital One Bank, NA, in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Awah v. Capital One Bank, NA, No. 8:14-cv-01288-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Awah v. Capital One Bank

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2016
No. 16-1361 (4th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Awah v. Capital One Bank

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND AWAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK, NA, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 29, 2016

Citations

No. 16-1361 (4th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

To prevail on their MCDCA and derivative MCPA claims, Plaintiffs "must satisfy two elements: (1) that…

Peete-Bey v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp.

Based on the undisputed facts, no reasonable jury could conclude that ECMC communicated with Peete-Bey in a…