Opinion
Civil Action No.: 3:20-cv-02453-JMC Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-02454-JMC
07-06-2020
ORDER AND OPINION
This matter is before the court pursuant to Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 9, 11). The parties move the court to consolidate this case with a separate case in which Defendants South Carolina Department of Social Services ("SCDSS") are also parties, McMillian v. SCDSS, et al., Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-02454-JMC. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate in both cases. (ECF Nos. 9, 11).
Plaintiffs in A.W. v. SCDSS, Civil Action No. 20-cv-02453 and Plaintiff in McMillian v. SCDSS, Civil Action No. 20-cv-02454, filed respective Motions to Consolidate. (ECF Nos. 9, 11). --------
The court may consolidate multiple pending actions involving "common question[s] of law or fact" into one action in the interest of efficiency. Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). "District courts enjoy substantial discretion in deciding whether and to what extent to consolidate cases." Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1131 (2018).
There are common questions of fact and questions of law in both cases. Plaintiffs bring several causes of action against Defendants including, negligence and alleged violations of a minor's rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. (See ECF No. 1-1.) Further, Plaintiffs have consulted with counsel for all Defendants and Defendants consent to the granting of this Motion. (ECF No. 11.)
Upon review of the facts and law in each case, the court finds that there are common questions of law and fact within each case and that judicial efficiency is best served by consolidating the two cases. Accordingly, the court GRANTS the parties' respective Motions to Consolidate. (ECF Nos. 9, 11.) The cases are consolidated for pretrial purposes only.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/
United States District Judge July 6, 2020
Columbia, South Carolina