Summary
In Bronxville, this Court held that a six-year limitations period under CPLR § 213(8) applied because "[l]iability for investor fraud was not created by the Martin Act, but is recognized in case law predating that legislation" (181 A.D.2d 516, 581 N.Y.S.2d 189).
Summary of this case from People v. Credit Suisse Sec. (Usa) LLCOpinion
March 12, 1992
Leave to appeal to Court of Appeals granted unless plaintiff-respondent files note of issue with statement of readiness to proceed to trial. Upon failure so to file, the motion for leave to appeal is granted, as indicated.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.