From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AVENT v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3482 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3482 JAM DAD P.

August 24, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 17, 2011, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendant Lesane be denied. On August 15, 2011, the assigned district judge adopted those findings and recommendations in full and denied defendant's motion for summary judgment.

In due course, the court will issue a further scheduling order setting dates for pretrial statements, pretrial conference, and jury trial. However, before issuing the scheduling order, the court will set a mandatory settlement conference in this case. If available, the court may order that plaintiff participate in the settlement conference by way of video-conferencing. Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b), the parties will be directed to inform the court in writing as to whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate judge or if they wish to be referred to the court's mediation program.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, each party shall inform the court in writing as to whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate judge or if they wish to wish to be referred to the court's mediation program. If the parties wish to proceed before the undersigned magistrate judge, each party shall return to the court the consent form for settlement conferences provided with this order. If the parties do not wish the undersigned magistrate judge to preside at the settlement conference, each party shall file a declaration stating he wishes to be referred to the court's mediation program; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send each party the consent form for settlement conferences.

DATED: August 23, 2011. Case Number: NOTICE OF WAIVER OF DISQUALIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT JUDGE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 270(b)

Attorney's Name/Bar # Firm Name Address City, State, Zip email address Phone Fax Attorney for Plaintiff/Defendant's Name UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff's Name, Plaintiff, vs. Defendant's Name, Defendant. Plaintiff/Defendant Name hereby requests that the assigned Judge/Magistrate Judge participate in a settlement conference in this action and hereby waives any claim of disqualification of the assigned Judge/Magistrate Judge on that basis thereafter.


Summaries of

AVENT v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3482 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

AVENT v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:RUFUS A. AVENT, Plaintiff, v. M. CATE et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3482 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)