From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. State

STATES OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Oct 17, 2013
No. 10-13-00119-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2013)

Opinion

No. 10-13-00119-CR

2013-10-17

DANNY DEMON AUSTIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the County Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. C34404-CR


ORDER

On March 28, 2013, appellant, Danny Demon Austin, filed a pro se notice of appeal in this matter, wherein he requested that the trial court appoint him counsel to handle this appeal. On April 5, 2013, the trial court appointed appellate counsel to handle appellant's appeal.

Our records reflect that the Reporter's Record and the Clerk's Record were filed on April 23, 2013 and May 6, 2013, respectively. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a), appellant's brief was due thirty days from May 6, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). To date, we have not received a brief in this matter.

On June 21, 2013, this Court informed appellant's counsel that appellant's brief was late. Counsel responded on July 12, 2013, by filing a motion for extension of time to file a brief in this matter. This motion, however, did not contain a certificate of service or any indication that the motion had been served on the State. See id. at R. 9.5. Accordingly, on July 31, 2013, this Court informed counsel that he needed to serve a copy of his motion on the State and provide this Court with proof of service within fourteen days of July 31, 2013. We have not received a response to our July 31, 2013 letter.

In his motion, appellant requested "an extension of not later than July 19, 2013" to file an Anders brief; however, as stated above, we have not received a brief in this matter.

Thereafter, on August 29, 2013, we abated and remanded this cause to the trial court with instructions to hold a hearing to determine: (1) why appellant did not serve his motion on the State; (2) why appellant did not timely respond to this Court's notices; (3) whether appellant still desired to proceed with the appeal; and (4) whether appellant has been receiving effective assistance of counsel.

The trial court conducted a hearing on September 16, 2013. Appellant's counsel attended the hearing and notified the trial court that he has had some medical issues for which he has sought treatment. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court determined that appellant's counsel has provided effective assistance of counsel but ordered him to file a proper motion for extension of time with this Court by September 17, 2013, and his completed appellate brief by September 23, 2013.

About two weeks after the trial court's September 17, 2013 deadline, on October 1, 2013, this Court received a motion for extension of time filed by appellant's counsel that does not specify the amount of time needed to file appellant's brief. And perhaps more importantly, appellant's counsel once again failed to include a certificate of service or provide the number of copies required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.3, 9.5.

Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to hold another hearing to determine whether appellant is receiving effective assistance of counsel. The trial court shall conduct the hearing within twenty-one (21) days after the date of this order. The trial court clerk and court reporter shall file supplemental records within thirty-five (35) days after the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Do not publish


Summaries of

Austin v. State

STATES OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Oct 17, 2013
No. 10-13-00119-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Austin v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANNY DEMON AUSTIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:STATES OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Oct 17, 2013

Citations

No. 10-13-00119-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2013)