From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. Mingo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Oct 5, 2015
No. 1:12CV266-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Oct. 5, 2015)

Opinion

No. 1:12CV266-GHD-DAS

10-05-2015

THOMAS EARL AUSTIN, JR. PETITIONER v. DERRICK MINGO RESPONDENT


FINAL JUDGMENT

Having considered the file and records in this action, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was duly served by mail upon the pro se petitioner at his last known address; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation should therefore be approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. It is ordered:

1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court.

2. That the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

3. That this case is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED, this, the 5th day of October, 2015.

/s/_________

SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

Austin v. Mingo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Oct 5, 2015
No. 1:12CV266-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Oct. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Austin v. Mingo

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS EARL AUSTIN, JR. PETITIONER v. DERRICK MINGO RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2015

Citations

No. 1:12CV266-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Oct. 5, 2015)