Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A [3d Dept 2003

Full title: In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 28, 2003

(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 28, 2003)

Opinion

January 28, 2003.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993, was suspended by this Court's order dated November 20, 1998 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 255 A.D.2d 827).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Daniel K. Perlman, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent's instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.