From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance v. Osborne

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 3, 1998
716 A.2d 1029 (Md. 1998)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG, No. 54, September Term, 1998.

September 3, 1998.


ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Woodley B. Osborne, Respondent. The Court having considered the petition, it is this 3rd day of September, 1998,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Woodley B. Osborne, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.15(a) and 5.3(c)(2) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further ORDERED that the Respondent shall complete a continuing legal education course in professional responsibility, approved in advance by the District of Columbia's Bar Counsel, and that the Respondent shall certify his completion of such a course to this Court, with a copy to Maryland's Bar Counsel, within six months from the date of an Opinion and Order by which the District of Columbia Court of Appeals disciplined the Respondent for the same misconduct set forth herein.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance v. Osborne

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 3, 1998
716 A.2d 1029 (Md. 1998)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance v. Osborne

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, PETITIONER, v. WOODLEY B…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Sep 3, 1998

Citations

716 A.2d 1029 (Md. 1998)
716 A.2d 1029