From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance v. Carnot

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jul 23, 2004
854 A.2d 878 (Md. 2004)

Opinion

Misc. AG No. 29, September Term, 2004.

July 23, 2004.


ORDER


The Court having considered the Petition of Kimberly Hope Carnot for Reinstatement and the answers filed thereto in the above captioned case, it is this 23rd day of July, 2004

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring. that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and, the petitioner, Kimberly Hope Carnot, is reinstated to the practice of law in this State, and it is further

ORDERED, that pursuant to Rule 11 (Professionalism Course) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Maryland, Kimberly Hope Carnot must take the Professionalism Course when it is next offered and her failure to take the course will subject her to possible decertification from the practice of law in this State, and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Kimberly Hope Carnot upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance v. Carnot

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jul 23, 2004
854 A.2d 878 (Md. 2004)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance v. Carnot

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Kimberly Hope CARNOT

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jul 23, 2004

Citations

854 A.2d 878 (Md. 2004)
854 A.2d 878