From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Attorney Discipline Bd.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 2, 2016
SC: 153046 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153046

02-02-2016

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, Defendant.


Order

153046(3) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant to extend the time for filing its answer to the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before February 24, 2016.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2016

/s/_________


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Attorney Discipline Bd.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 2, 2016
SC: 153046 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Attorney Discipline Bd.

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

SC: 153046 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)