From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n. v. Kum

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sep 10, 2014
440 Md. 30 (Md. 2014)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 73, Sept. Term, 2012.

09-10-2014

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Joseph Mua KUM.

Raymond A. Hein, Deputy Bar Counsel (Glenn M. Grossman, Bar Counsel, Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland), for Petitioner. No argument on behalf of Respondent.


Raymond A. Hein, Deputy Bar Counsel (Glenn M. Grossman, Bar Counsel, Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland), for Petitioner.

No argument on behalf of Respondent.

Argued before BARBERA, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, ADKINS, McDONALD and WATTS, JJ.

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 10th day September, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Joseph Mua Kum, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joseph Mua Kum from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16–760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16–761(b), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Joseph Mua Kum.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n. v. Kum

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sep 10, 2014
440 Md. 30 (Md. 2014)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n. v. Kum

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Joseph Mua KUM.

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Date published: Sep 10, 2014

Citations

440 Md. 30 (Md. 2014)
99 A.3d 288