From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Haar

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 22, 2022
Misc. AG 83-2021 (Md. Apr. 22, 2022)

Opinion

Misc. AG 83-2021

04-22-2022

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. PAUL SAUL HAAR


ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Paul Saul Haar, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law in Maryland for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, followed by one year of probation with terms, it is this 22nd day of April, 2022

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Paul Saul Haar, be suspended for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, for violation of Rule 1.15(e) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that upon his reinstatement to practice of law in the State of Maryland, the Respondent is placed on one year of probation with the terms contained in the Probation Agreement.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Haar

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 22, 2022
Misc. AG 83-2021 (Md. Apr. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Haar

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. PAUL SAUL HAAR

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Apr 22, 2022

Citations

Misc. AG 83-2021 (Md. Apr. 22, 2022)