From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Coll. Ser. v. Robbins Law Firm

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 18, 2002
77 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 80480

June 18, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Thad F. Niemira.

Vincent D. Vogler, Donald A. Horowitz, The Vogler Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Timothy L. Donaho, Jr., The Robbins Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J.



ORDER


Defendant, the Robbins Law Firm, P.C., appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its motion to quash execution of a foreign judgment obtained against it in the State of California. Defendant argues that the California judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court entered a five page Judgment and Order setting out the basis for personal jurisdiction under California law. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Attorney Coll. Ser. v. Robbins Law Firm

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 18, 2002
77 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Attorney Coll. Ser. v. Robbins Law Firm

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY COLLECTION SERVICES, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. THE ROBBINS LAW…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 18, 2002

Citations

77 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)