From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ATT WIRELESS PCS INC. v. CITY OF ATLANTA

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Aug 10, 2001
260 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

No. 00-15885.

August 10, 2001.

G. Wayne Hillis, Jr., Erika C. Birg, Parker, Hudson, Rainer Dobbs, Atlanta, GA, Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 98-00962-CV-JEC-1); Julie E. Carnes, Judge.

(Opinion May 8, 2001, 250 F.3d 1307, 11th Cir., 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether rehearing en banc should be granted, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

ATT WIRELESS PCS INC. v. CITY OF ATLANTA

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Aug 10, 2001
260 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

ATT WIRELESS PCS INC. v. CITY OF ATLANTA

Case Details

Full title:ATT WIRELESS PCS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ATLANTA, Atlanta…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Aug 10, 2001

Citations

260 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Qwest Corp. v. City of Santa Fe

To support its argument that a Section 1983 claim is viable in this context, Qwest cites the Eleventh…

Omnipoint Communications v. City of White Plains

This decision, however, was recently vacated in anticipation of an en banc rehearing. ATT Wireless PCS, Inc.…