From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AT&T Inc. v. Christian

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 9, 2018
No. 05-17-01395-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2018)

Opinion

No. 05-17-01395-CV

02-09-2018

AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS, Appellants v. ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees


On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Seeking to appeal the trial court's denial of their rule 91a motion to dismiss a baseless claim, appellants have filed a petition for permissive interlocutory appeal. We deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2017); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3, 42.3(a).

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE 171395F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that appellees ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS recover their costs of this appeal from appellants AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS. Judgment entered February 9, 2018


Summaries of

AT&T Inc. v. Christian

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 9, 2018
No. 05-17-01395-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2018)
Case details for

AT&T Inc. v. Christian

Case Details

Full title:AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Feb 9, 2018

Citations

No. 05-17-01395-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2018)