Opinion
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00430-JRG-RSP
08-17-2023
ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. TP-LINK TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., TP-LINK CORPORATION LIMITED, TP-LINK INTERNATIONAL LTD., Defendants.
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. and TP-Link Corporation, Ltd., f/k/a TP-Link International, Ltd.'s (collectively, “Defendants”) previously filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement and No Pre-Suit Indirect Infringement (the “Motion”) (Dkt. No. 195.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 262), recommending denial of Defendants' Motion. Defendants have now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 281).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendants' Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Motion (Dkt. No. 195) is DENIED.
So Ordered this