From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atene v. Lawrence

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 24, 1972
289 A.2d 178 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1972)

Opinion

December 8, 1971.

March 24, 1972.

Appeals — Final or interlocutory order — Order directing plaintiff to file a remittitur or that defendant's motion for new trial be granted.

An order directing plaintiff to file a remittitur of all sums in excess of a stated amount or that defendant's motion for new trial be granted is not an appealable order.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, and CERCONE, JJ.

Appeals, Nos. 1324 and 1354, Oct. T., 1971, from order of Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, of Philadelphia, Sept. T., 1961, No. 400, in case of Angelo P. Atene v. Paul A. Lawrence. Appeals quashed.

Trespass for personal injuries. Before McCLANAGHAN, J.

Verdict for plaintiff in amount of $20,000. Order entered directing remittitur of all amounts in excess of $13,500. Plaintiff appealed.

Fred Lowenschuss, with him Fred Lowenschuss Associates, for plaintiff.

Joseph G. Manta, with him James M. Marsh, and LaBrum and Doak, for defendant.


Argued December 8, 1971.


In this trespass action involving an automobile collision the jury brought in a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $20,000.00. Motions for new trial and judgment n.o.v. were filed by defendant. After argument, defendant's motion for judgment n.o.v. was withdrawn and the lower court made the following order: "July 2nd, 1971: Plaintiff is directed to file a remittitur of all sums in excess of $13,500.00 or Defendant's motion for New Trial is granted."

The plaintiff did not file a remittitur and both parties appealed from the order of July 2, 1971. However, this is not an appealable order and both appeals must be quashed. Clarkson v. Crawford, 285 Pa. 299, 132 A. 350 (1926).

No judgment has been entered nor has a new trial been granted. Nowhere on the record is there a statement by plaintiff that he will not remit. Until such election is made, an appealable final order cannot be entered. If the plaintiff decides to remit, a judgment may be entered on the verdict as remitted and a judgment appealable by the defendant exists. If plaintiff refuses to remit, an order granting a new trial should be entered. Such an order is also appealable.

Both appeals are quashed.


Summaries of

Atene v. Lawrence

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 24, 1972
289 A.2d 178 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1972)
Case details for

Atene v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:Atene, Appellant, v. Lawrence

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 24, 1972

Citations

289 A.2d 178 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1972)
289 A.2d 178

Citing Cases

Atene v. Lawrence

Appeal, No. 247, Jan. T., 1973, from order of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1972, No. 806, affirming order of…

Almi, Inc. v. Dick Corp.

Instead, until acted upon by Dick, it makes impossible a determination as to how the matter will be finally…