Opinion
Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-2221-L.
March 25, 2008
ORDER
Before the court are the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed February 26, 2008. No objections to the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions were filed.
This is a habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney found that the petition should be denied because Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the state court's decision to deny relief is not contrary to or does not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law and is not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings
Having reviewed the pleadings, file and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct. The magistrate judge's findings and conclusions are therefore accepted as those of the court. The court therefore dismisses with prejudice the writ of habeas corpus for failure to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right.
It is so ordered.