From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ASHE v. NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 3, 2002
294 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 01-02328

May 3, 2002.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Glownia, J.), entered February 2, 2001, which granted defendants' motion and dismissed the complaint.

SULLIVAN OLIVERIO GIOIA LLP, BUFFALO (KEVIN M. CARTER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

VICKY-MARIE BRUNETTE ANTHONY, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, HAYES, KEHOE, AND GORSKI, JJ.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, defendants are not estopped from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense where, as here, there is no proof that plaintiff "was induced by fraud, misrepresentations or deception to refrain from filing a timely action" ( Simcuski v. Saeli, 44 N.Y.2d 442, 449). Although the parties had numerous discussions concerning whether defendants would pay plaintiff no-fault benefits, they had only preliminarily discussed settlement of the personal injury claim, and plaintiff had not yet made a demand for settlement. Thus, it cannot be said that defendants "improperly lull[ed the] plaintiff into failing to bring [her] claim" ( Procco v. Kennedy, 88 A.D.2d 761, 761, affd 58 N.Y.2d 804).


Summaries of

ASHE v. NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 3, 2002
294 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

ASHE v. NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORT

Case Details

Full title:DORIS A. ASHE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 3, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

Nowacki v. Becker

In support of her contention, plaintiff alleges that defendant's insurer agreed to extend the statute of…

Lohnas v. Luzi

We further conclude, however, that the court erred in determining that plaintiff raised triable issues of…