From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashburn v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Sep 17, 2012
NO. 2:10-0123 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 2:10-0123

09-17-2012

LARRY JEREMY ASHBURN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC., et al., Defendants.


Judge Haynes/Bryant


SCHEDULING ORDER

The defendant Household Financial Center, Inc. has filed its answer to the plaintiffs' complaint (Docket Entry No. 52). Therefore, the following scheduling order is ENTERED:

I. GENERAL COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

Any filing made with the Court must comply with Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires that a copy of the filing be sent to the opposing party or his counsel and that the filing contain a certification stating that a copy has been sent, to whom, at what address, and on what date. Any filing that does not comply with this requirement will be returned and/or stricken from the record.

Each party is responsible for making and obtaining copies of any documents or filings he or she sends to the Court. It is not the Court's responsibility to provide free copies of any documents to the parties. If a party desires to obtain a copy of a document in the official court file, the party should contact the Clerk's Office, with the docket entry number of the document if possible, to request a copy. The cost of an electronically filed document is 10¢ per page, or 50¢ per page if it is not electronically filed.

Each party is required to keep both the Court and the opposing party or his counsel informed of his or her current address. A plaintiff's failure to keep the Court informed of his or her current address may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's order.

II. PRETRIAL DEADLINES

Amendment of Pleadings

The parties shall have until November 16, 2012, to move to amend the pleadings.

Discovery

All discovery shall be completed by January 15, 2013. By this, the Court means that all written discovery should be served far enough before the discovery completion date, i.e. at least thirty days prior to the discovery completion deadline, so that responses or objections to any written discovery can be made prior to the completion deadline. For example, serving written discovery upon an opposing party a few days prior to the discovery completion deadline does not comply with this scheduling order and may result in discovery being denied to the requesting party.

Any party seeking to serve written discovery upon another party that would result in responses being served after the discovery completion deadline must obtain leave of the Court to serve untimely discovery requests.

Written discovery should be sent to the opposing party and should not be filed with the Court, nor should a copy of the written discovery be sent to the Court unless it is sent as an attachment to a discovery motion. A court order is not required for a party to engage in discovery and discovery in an action is not stayed upon the filing of any motion unless specifically ordered by the Court.

Discovery Motions

All discovery motions must be filed by January 15, 2013. All discovery motions must comply with the applicable requirements contained in Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 37.01 of the Local Rules of Court, or any other relevant Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Before any motion related to a discovery dispute is filed, the parties shall conduct a telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge about the matter in dispute.

No discovery dispute related motion shall be filed without first contacting the Magistrate Judge's office and scheduling a telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge about the dispute.

Dispositive Motions

All dispositive motions to dismiss or for summary judgment shall be filed by February 14, 2012. Responses shall be due by March 14, 2013, and replies, if any, limited to five (5) pages, shall be due by March 29, 2013. Plaintiff is forewarned that dispositive motions must be responded to by March 14, 2013, unless an extension is granted by the Court, and that failure to respond to the motion and to statements of facts may result in the Court taking the facts alleged in the matter as true and granting the relief requested. In responding, plaintiff may not just rely on his complaint. Plaintiff must show there is a material dispute of fact with citation to the record, affidavits or other matter of evidence. Plaintiff should read and comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule LR 56.01(a). If dispositive motions are filed before the deadline, the deadlines for filing responses and replies shall be advanced accordingly.

Other Motions

Any other motions (other than in limine or related to trial matters) must be filed by February 14, 2012.

This matter is set for a jury trial on September 17, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., with a final pretrial conference on September 6, 2013, at 3:00 p.m. Both the trial and final pretrial conference will be held in Cookeville, Tennessee.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

JOHN S. BRYANT

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Ashburn v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Sep 17, 2012
NO. 2:10-0123 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Ashburn v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LARRY JEREMY ASHBURN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

NO. 2:10-0123 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 17, 2012)