From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asha v. Goldsten

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 14, 1944
140 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1944)

Opinion

No. 8456.

Argued January 18, 1944.

Decided February 14, 1944.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Action between Mike Asha and Charles L. Goldsten and another. From an adverse judgment, the former appeals.

Affirmed.

Mr. Joseph C. Turco, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Arthur C. Katims, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. James P. Donovan, of Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.


The sole ground of appeal is an alleged error of the court below in instructing the jury. Appellant made no objection to the instruction at the trial and, therefore, under Rule 51 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the judgment will be

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Asha v. Goldsten

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 14, 1944
140 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
Case details for

Asha v. Goldsten

Case Details

Full title:ASHA v. GOLDSTEN et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 14, 1944

Citations

140 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1944)

Citing Cases

Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.

We therefore rule that appellants are now in no position to complain of the charge. Lippman v. Williams, 79…

De Fries v. David

It has repeatedly been held that an instruction not objected to below will not be considered on appeal. Here…